b. 42
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In GE1 there is a crotchet rest on the top stave at the beginning of the bar. The mistake resulted from confusing this bar with bar 43. See the note above. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing slur in FE must be an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver. The slur was added by EE, most probably by analogy with previous motifs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The absence of in FE (→EE) can be explained in many different ways, which we sort by likelihood (from most to least likely, according to us):
In this situation, taking into account the first two possibilities and the authority of the principal source, we give directly in the main text. Similarly, in bar 54. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The change of to is a very common inaccuracy in Chopin's editions by M. Schlesinger – see note in bar 43. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The change of to is a very common inaccuracy in Chopin's editions by M. Schlesinger – see note to Etude in C, Op. 10 No. 1. At this point, the alleged change of marking would only be a reminder of the time signature in force from the beginning of the piece. The error was corrected – perhaps at Chopin's request – in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |