Slurs
|
b. 135
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The prolonged ending of the slur in FE (→EE) must be an inaccuracy by the copyist or by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||
|
b. 135-140
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In GE1 the first part of the slur beginning in bar 135 was overlooked – it is only just in a new line, from bar 140, that the remaining part of the slur appears. The mistake was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 155-159
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the slur added to A (→GE) after [FC] had been finished. In FE (→EE) the slur is absent, as in analogous bars 68-72. See also bars 160-163 and 164. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||
|
b. 160-163
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in the case of the previous, long slur, Chopin added 8 subsequent, half-bar slurs to A after [FC] had been finished. The EE2 slurs were added after comparing it with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||
|
b. 164
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Like the previous ones, the L.H. slurs were almost certainly added to A after [FC] had been finished, which explains their absence in FE (→EE1). In EE2 they were added on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
in 
