data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
|
Separate slurs in A, contextual interpretation |
|
|
||
|
In A the slur over the final triplet was placed inaccurately – its beginning is closer to the preceding semiquaver, while its ending reaches the next bar. According to us, both ends were written with a flourish, and the slur is to be interpreted as a slur encompassing the triplet only, as in analogous bar 78. However, in GE it also encompasses the semiquaver. The continuous FE (→EE) slur, which could have resulted from Chopin's corrections to [FC], can be considered an equal variant.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Slurs