data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The origin of the difference in the position of the pedal markings between A and FE is unclear. In A bar 52 is tightly packed, as a result of which the mark is actually under the rest, whereas it starts at the beginning of the bar. It could have been misinterpreted by the copyist as a pedal change between bars 51-52. If we were to add to it a mistake in the placement of the next
mark, the FE pedalling would come from mistakes. On the other hand, it is pianistically justified and could have been introduced by Chopin – cf. the authentic pedalling of all subsequent appearances of the descending motif consisting of three octaves (bars 153-154, 197-198 and 233-234), in which it always enters against a sound sustained with pedal (pressed earlier). Taking into account the above, in the main text we suggest a variant solution with the A pedalling as the main one.
The change of pedalling in EE2 was undoubtedly influenced by GE1.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Pedalling