data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Page:
Source:
p. 8, b. 132-144
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
The position of the mark in bar 142 in the middle of the 2nd demisemiquaver sextuplet is almost certainly inaccurate – see the note in bar 141. The same applies to the
mark in bar 143. In the main text we provide a contextual interpretation of both marks, which coincide with the structural division of the figuration – marked by, e.g. harmonic changes – into whole-bar sections, starting from the 2nd quaver of the bar.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions
issues:
notation: Verbal indications
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1