Page: 
Source: 
p. 12, b. 203-223
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-32
p. 3, b. 33-62
p. 4, b. 63-78
p. 5, b. 79-98
p. 6, b. 99-116
p. 7, b. 117-131
p. 8, b. 132-144
p. 9, b. 145-165
p. 10, b. 166-182
p. 11, b. 183-202
p. 12, b. 203-223
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 207

in FE, contextual interpretation

rf in GE

in EE

In FE we can see here "zf", which we change to the correct . We discuss in detail the issue of the Chopinesque notation of forzando and its variants in the sources in the note in bar 1. The symbols introduced by GE and EE were arbitrary attempts at finding the correct substitute for the erroneous FE notation.
In FE it is unclear whether the indication is supposed to concern the left or the right hand. We assume that it concerns the left hand, as the mark is still over the initial octave, which suits the music better if we take into account the fact that Chopin would use  as an accent. The marks in GE and EE rather refer to the R.H.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1