data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
In this place corrections were being made, both in FE and GE, most probably from the following version: , which probably originated from the FE engraver having misinterpreted the following [A] notation:
(similar issues concerning the reproduction of the Chopinesque notation of an augmented prime – see the Ballade in G minor, Op. 23, bar 170). In the FE (→EE) version, undoubtedly authentic, the wrong order of the b
2 and b2 notes in the 1st chord makes the middle note of the 2nd chord an erroneous b2. Therefore, in the main text we switch these notes; moreover, we introduce the contemporary version of notation of an augmented prime. The GE version, which can be attributed to both Chopin and the reviser, can be considered a potentially authentic variant.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations
issues: Errors in FE, GE revisions, Authentic corrections of FE, Authentic corrections of GE, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch