Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-32
p. 3, b. 33-62
p. 4, b. 63-78
p. 5, b. 79-98
p. 6, b. 99-116
p. 7, b. 117-131
p. 8, b. 132-144
p. 9, b. 145-165
p. 10, b. 166-182
p. 11, b. 183-202
p. 12, b. 203-223
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text


  b. 10

Wedges in FE

Staccato dots in GE

No marks in EE

Crotchets suggested by the editors

Taking into account the e and f minims in the preceding bar and the absence of pedal markings, we assume that the most likely scenario is that the FE engraver mistook the crotchet stems (pointing upwards) prolonging g and g for wedges. In the main text we also move the legato indication, in this context most probably meant to indicate "harmonic legato". GE replacing wedges by staccato dots is a part of revision, encompassing the entire Variations – see the note in bar 7. The missing marks in EE are due to an oversight or revision. 

Learn more »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE, Errors in EE, GE revisions

notation: Rhythm, Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1