data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Main text
compare
The absence of four accents in GE suggests that they were added in the last stage of proofreading FE, after the copy meant as the basis for GE had been sent to Leipzig. However, the marks could have also been omitted due to the GE1 engraver's inattention.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins