data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
According to us, the source version in which the last semiquaver in bar 192 and 194, devoid of an accidental, is an a3 is probably erroneous. Chopin omitted a number of necessary flats to c, g
and d
(even in the case of the first note in a bar, d
3 in bar 195) when writing down bars 191-196, in the key of G
. This suggests that Chopin considered the notes in this fragments to naturally belong to the key of G
; he remembered to provide some of them with flats only from time to time. It is also worth emphasising that an indirect transition of an altered note to its resolution – in this case a3-d
3-b
3 – is much less frequent than the direct one, which is another argument for a
3. In this situation, we consider the absence of an accidental to be a sign that the note belongs to the current key, hence that it is not an altered note, and in the main text we suggest a
3.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
issues: Omission of current key accidentals
notation: Pitch