data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Taking into account the articulation markings in the parts of both hands in the preceding passage (staccato dots) and in the pair of chords ending the theme (slurs), we consider the absence of the L.H. slur in the discussed place to be a defect of notation (because of Chopin or the FE engraver). Therefore, in the main text we include the addition introduced by GE and EE.
See also bar 62.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions
notation: Slurs