data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
The absence of the marks in GE and EE must be due to oversight, partially caused by the FE layout, in which the wedge was placed very close to the dashes marking the range of the octave sign. A similar situation occurred in bar 151.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in EE, Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins