data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The coincidence of triplet and motivic slurs in FE prompted the revisers of the remaining editions to intervene (the GE version could have resulted from a mistake). In the main text we suggest adding a second motivic slur over the part of the figure performed by the R.H., keeping the triplet slurs, as an exception, which in this case help one navigate the rhythmic structure of the figuration, different from the division into hands.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in GE
notation: Slurs