data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The change of to
in GE is probably an arbitrary revision by the publisher or even a mistake. A possible correction by Chopin seems much less likely due to the musically unjustified, excessive contrast with
, in force from bar 86 and in bar 88 (the Chopinesque
in bar 92 follows
and constitutes a spectacular and definite ending to the variation – cf. also the dynamics in bars 58-62).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions
notation: Verbal indications