



b. 94
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
FE (→EE) feature here an f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Errors repeated in EE |
||||
b. 96-97
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
Both versions may be authentic, and both are musically justified. From the pianistic point of view, repeating c category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||
b. 97-100
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
Chopin was adding the dashes marking the range of dim. to the end of bar 100; however, it is uncertain which marks are written in his hand – probably already from the third dash, which would be compliant with the notation of FE, and certainly the last 5 dashes (bars 99-100). The version of FE (→EE) may be inaccurate, since dashes are generally added to indications valid clearly longer than the word defining a given indication. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
As in bar 3, in the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||
b. 100-101
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The longer slur of FC (→GE) resulted from a correction by Chopin, who in FC added an ending of the slur reaching the c category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FC |