|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The third beat in the L.H. part remained unfilled in FC. In GE a crotchet rest was inserted here; however, the FE (→EE) version shows that it was a g-b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we give the FC (→GE) version. Although in analogous bars 49, 51 and 53 the second note is a semiquaver, the g2 quaver does not seem to be a mistake – together with the e2 note (prolonged due to the fact that it was played before), it is the quaver that constitutes an augmented version of the dotted rhythm opening the motif ( category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Dotted or even rhythm |
|||||
|
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FC the 'd' letters belonging to the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FC there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
As the 1st L.H. crotchet, EE erroneously has G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
-e1 chord that was overlooked.
). This rhythmic extension also impacts the next bar, which opens with a minim, and not with a crotchet. The semiquaver in 
marks blended in these bars with the staccato dots under the bass notes, which resulted in the absence of dots in 
to the top note of the L.H. chord on the 2nd beat of the bar (e1). The patent oversight – by the copyist or by Chopin – was corrected in