b. 57
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we include the hairpin present only in FE (→EE) in a variant form, since it is absent in the principal source, yet its authenticity is unquestionable; it can be considered a complement to the indication. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The easiest explanation for the missing staccato dot in FC (→GE) would be an oversight by the copyist – in the entire Mazurka a staccato mark on the 1st quaver in the bar is present in the vast majority of similar figures, thus constituting an element defining the Mazurka characteristic dance gesture. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FE, in the top voice the double dotted crotchet is followed by a quaver. A comparison with analogous bar 63, and above all the FC (→GE) version, prove that the value of the last note is erroneous, since it is to be a semiquaver. An adequate correction was introduced in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to d2 in bar 61 and to the d1-b1 sixth in bar 62. It was also GE that added accidentals to the sixth. The same in bars 69-70. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The easiest explanation for the missing staccato dot in FE (→EE) would be an oversight by the engraver – in the entire Mazurka a staccato mark on the 1st quaver in the bar appears in the vast majority of similar figures, constituting an element defining the characteristic dance gesture of the Mazurka. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |