Issues : Vertical accents
|
b. 21-25
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
Vertical accents in EE are most probably an arbitrary change introduced by the editor, although such form of accents in the manuscript - the base text for EE - cannot be completely excluded. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Vertical accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We recreated the accent and category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Vertical accents , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The interpretation of accents in A is particularly difficult in that bar, as neither the graphic analysis nor the stylistic one provide convincing arguments for considering them as long or short. It can only be stated that it most probably concerns 2 identical accents. GE and FE have short accents, while the second one is under the G note. EE has a vertical accent, only on the last note. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Vertical accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In A Chopin wrote the accent between the pentagrams. In GE1 Chopin's intention was recreated erroneously, moving the accent over the note. GE2 (→GE3→GE4) returns to Chopin's notation. EE has a vertical accent here, which is certainly an editorial revision. In FE the accent's sign was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Vertical accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The vertical accents in EE are certainly an arbitrary editor's revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Vertical accents |
after 
