Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
A (→GE), FE, EE1 differ in the dedication's wording - yet it concerns the same person. The A version does not precise to which of de Lobau sisters the piece was offered. We give the dedication according to the EE1, including full information concerning the dedication's addressee. In EE2 the dedication was removed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dedications |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We develop Chopin's abbreviation in the tempo indication: Allo = Allegro. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated indications |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE the indication legato was put between the pentagrams. It is unknown whether such placement complies with Chopin's intention or if it is an inaccuracy in the base's reproduction. After all, it is not of practical importance, as in Chopin's notation signs and indications placed over the R.H. may refer to both hands. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In A Chopin deleted the abbreviated performance indication m.v. (= mezza voce) category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: No initial dynamic marking , Deletions in A |
||||||
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
FE is lacking the dashes determining the crescendo's range, which is supposedly the engraver's oversight. Such errors were quite frequent in Chopin's first prints. Division of the word crescendo into syllables in EE is probably a revision of that edition (cf. bars 25-26), although such a notation can also be found in Chopin's autographs. The abbreviation cres used by Chopin was replaced by us with the currently adopted conventional abbreviation cresc. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Abbreviated indications |