data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE1
compare
The sources differ in the positioning of the end of the slur. A may be interpreted in 2 ways: the most natural one seems to be the way when we lead the slur to the end of the part of the R.H. The slur was recreated in such a manner in GE. FE's slur ends on the triplet, while in EE it was led to the last crotchet of the bar.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
notation: Slurs