Issues : Placement of markings
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The hairpin, in A and in the majority of the editions placed under the three-note progression of the bass, was moved to between the staves in GE2op (→GE3op). In this case, this quite frequently used revision completely changed the meaning of the sign. In the remaining GE, the sign was reproduced in the correct place, however, it starts already under the 1st crotchet in the bar. The absence of the sign in EEW is undoubtedly an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Placement of markings , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 98-100
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In accordance with the explanation in the note in b. 87, to the main text we adopt the notation of FE (→EE) with accents over the a-a1 octaves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings |
||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The slur over the pair of chords could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE. In GE1Ab it was moved under the chords, as a result of which it can be considered to be a tie of f1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 105
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In FEG Chopin wrote the leggiero indication over the R.H. part. It is similarly placed also in FE and EE. However, in GE the indication was placed between the staves, contrary to Chopin's inscription in FEG. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Placement of markings |