Issues : Enharmonic corrections
b. 47-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI Chopin wrote the 12th semiquaver in bars 47-48 (and in bar 49, marked as repetition of bar 48) as f1. In FE (→GE,EE) the note is written as g1, as a result of which the next note has to be provided with a . category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the last group of semiquavers, in the place where FE (→GE,EE) has a b1, in AI there is a c2. By introducing this clearly justified correction, Chopin did not check its result precisely – in FE (→GE1→GE1a,EE) there is no before c2, still necessary despite the change of the previous note from c2 to b1. This patent oversight was corrected in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
b. 54-56
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
In these bars the version of FCI clearly deviates from the final one – different harmonic rhythm in b. 54 and different shape of the melody in b. 55-56. We can also observe small changes to the arrangement of chords and enharmonic notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Accompaniment changes , Enharmonic corrections , Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
b. 58
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Change of d1 into c1 is an undeniable improvement here, introduced into [A] (→PE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Enharmonic corrections |