Issues : Differences in fingering

b. 106-108

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

Fingering written into FEH in bar 108

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH

b. 111-113

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FEH

Fingering written into FES, bar 113

Fingering based on FES, bar 111

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE

..

It is difficult to evaluate the authenticity of the fingering of FEH in bars 111 and 113 – the digits are very similar to the Chopinesque ones, but the fingering differs from the one written by Chopin (in pencil, under Miss Stirling's entry written in ink) in FES. From the pianistic point of view, both fingerings are natural and convenient – in the fingering of FES, the next note, b1, is most probably to be performed with the 5th finger; it may be easier for a smaller hand. The digits added by Fontana in EE define the same fingering that was written in FEH.
In the main text, we give the fingering written in FES the first time the passage appears, i.e. in bar 111 – cf. the General Editorial Principlesp. 17.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH

b. 113

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE

..

The fingering added in EE by Fontana is adjusted to the probably erroneous version of the 6th semiquaver of the bar (although its application in the version adopted in the main text is naturally possible). This fact most probably proves that it is totally arbitrary. The fingering of both sources, compliant in the ascending part of the passage, suggests changing the hand position marked by the placement of the 1st finger, which was on the anote in the previous passage. However, the Chopinesque fingering added to FES in the 2nd half of the bar, where the 1st finger is also on a1, suggests that Chopin meant to preserve this position also in the discussed passage, filling the 1st half of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH

b. 114-115

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Earlier fingering in AsI

Later fingering in AsI

No fingering in A (→GEFE,EE,FESB)

Our alternative variant suggestion

..

In AsI, in both bars, Chopin added a fingering with pencil; in b. 114 it was already a second version of fingering, replacing the earlier ink entry. In the main text we include the later version; as alternative solutions, we suggest the earlier version or both in a variant form.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Differences in fingering

b. 117

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FEH, probable reading

No teaching fingering

..

The fingering in FEH raises doubts concerning the interpretation of the first digit applying to e3. It seems that it is a '1,' but it would be inconsistent with the fingering of an identical place in bars 120-121 written in this copy – the 1st finger on the last gin bar 120 (116) implies another, most probably the 2nd finger on the next note (e3). The second finger on that ealso follows from the fingerings of the previous bar in other pupils' copies. The discussed doubt and contradictions make us omit this entry in the main text.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH