![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Tenuto slurs
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Same as in the previous bars, dividing the slur of A into two parts was an arbitrary decision of GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||
b. 145-147
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Both notations of the slur in bars 145-146 – GC (→GE) and FE3 (→FE4) – mean generally the same, yet the notation used in FE accentuates the necessity of holding the full rhythmic value of the chord in bar 146, which is often not observed in the case of the last note under the slur. Chopin would often use this notation, cf., e.g., 1st mov., bar 176, the Etude in A minor, Op. 25 No. 4, bar 50, in C category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE , Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||
b. 170-172
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs in GC are written neglectfully, hence their meaning is unobvious – GE regarded them as parts of one slur. In the main text we give the slur of FE, displaying a characteristic, prolonged tenuto ending, analogous to the slur in the next phrase. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC , Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||
b. 187-188
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the R.H. slurring after GE – a slur/tenuto in b. 186-187 and a longer slur starting from b. 188. Such a solution is supported by the following arguments:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||
b. 222-224
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur added – most probably by Chopin – in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4) clearly shows that according to the composer's intention, it was not supposed to reach the next bar. The longer slur of EE may be considered in this situation an inaccurate interpretation of the slur added in the base text by Chopin (cf. bars 36-37) or an editorial revision on the basis of the analogous place of the first section of Scherzo. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Tenuto slurs |