![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Centrally placed marks
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The position of the category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||||||||||
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions , Errors of FC , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||||||||||
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
In the main text we suggest to reconstruct the version of [A2], which could have been distorted in GE1 due to the transition into a new line (after all, it cannot be excluded that it was in the autograph itself that the pair of hairpins was placed directly under the d1 minim). As there are no doubts that the marks are to emphasise this very minim, according to us, one can also combine the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||||||||||
b. 51-63
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A the dynamic marks – category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In A1 Chopin wrote the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |