![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in FEJ
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
FE1 does not have a single accidental in this entire bar, which means that the diminished chord d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 18-20
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor
..
Similarly to analog. b. 15, the fingering versions of FEJ and FES differ in the performing manner of the e crotchet in b. 19. For the remaining notes (until c category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||||||
b. 20-21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor
..
As was the case with b. 16-17, FEJ and FES indicate the pass of the 1st finger in a different place. However, both copies are in agreement about the F category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The fact that FE (→EE) have got a mistaken version here is testififed by the version of GE and a hand-written correction in FEJ. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||||||
b. 22-24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In FES and FEJ the runs of the L.H. were reduced to four last notes, which were entrusted with the value of a semiquaver. It is undoubtedly a facilitation aiming at possibilitating an amateur performance of the Etude to the technically less advanced pianists. As in both places FES includes Chopin fingering, concerning the original, full version of these passages, we consider the introduced facilitations as the ossia più facile versions and we include them in the form of variants of the basic text of these sources.
The notation of FEJ is of a more draft nature, transferring only the general idea of this facilitation. It is probably the reason of leaving the a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEJ |