Issues : Errors in EE
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The only staccato sign in A is the wedge at the beginning of bar 6. The dots in bars 6 were added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE1→GE1a→GE2 category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the sources, the indications concerning the e1 crotchet are unclear. The fact of shifting the accent in A to the right may be considered as an irrelevant inaccuracy of notation or a suggestion of the sign's length. The version of FE seems to be even more puzzling, especially given the fact that it was most probably corrected – over the stave, to the right of the note there are visible possible traces of deletion of the accent. It is also unclear why the staccato dot was not included neither in GE nor in EE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In EE1 the lowest note of the last beat in the R.H. is the erroneous a1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The sources differ in notation of the accidentals on the 1st and 4th semiquavers of the last group. Due to the regularity of the figurations, it can be assumed that Chopin was thinking about b2-d3 and d3-f3. When the group is written without the octave sign, the text does not require any signs and this is the notation we see in FE. In the remaining sources, an octave sign was used (same as in the main text), which leads to the need of making the notation more precise:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In EE there is no returning d4 at the beginning of the 2nd group of semiquavers. This rather obvious error remained unnoticed by the revisers of EE and was never corrected. According to us, it is possible that it was the copyist writing the base text to EE that committed the mistake, as in analogous bar 69, which was marked as repetition of bar 1 in the manuscripts, a respective was probably added in EE in print. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |