Issues : Errors repeated in EE
|
b. 582
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), the sharp is placed over the grupetto mark. The patent mistake was corrected in GE by removing the erroneous mark. In the main text, we move the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 588
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In EE1 the bottom note of the L.H. crotchet is an erroneous A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE1→EE2), there is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver. The undoubtedly necessary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 655
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The versions of FE and EE1 must be erroneous (in addition, FE do not contain a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 707
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
in 
2 as the bottom note of the grupetto seems to be more natural than c2, and the intended mark (
1. The mistake was initially also in 
was added only just in 
before the 3rd crotchet), since a simple scheme, on which this harmonic accompaniment is based, would be distorted, without a sonic explanation. 
3 instead of b