|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In one of the later proofreadings of FE (→GE,EE) Chopin added the slur combining f and e (it is absent both in FEcor and Ap). Similarly in bars 4 and 39. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI, FEcor and EE2 the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of CLI |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in analogous bars 3-4, we propose an alternative interpretation of the short category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bar 4, the rhythm's corrections written in FEcor confirm that the crotchets in CLI and Ap is the original version, changed by Chopin in all three analogous places (also in bar 39). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
A has G as the 2nd note in the L.H., same as in the remaining analogous bars. However, the note is written a little bit too low, which probably resulted in its interpretation as F in FE (→EE3). This almost patent error was corrected in GE and EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
returning d1 on the 4th beat of the bar was omitted, which is a patent error. Same as in 
before g
in 
