Issues : Alterations in GC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
This bar was written in GC twice. After having noticed the mistake, the first notation was deleted. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Alterations in GC |
|||
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The topmost note of the last chord in the R.H. was certainly corrected in GC from a1 to b1. It is hard to state clearly whether it is Gutmann's own correction or whether it was Chopin that noticed and corrected the wrong pitch while reviewing GC. Cf. the note in bar 13. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GC , Alterations in GC |
|||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The version with A1, present in GC (→GE) and EE3, is almost certainly erroneous:
In the version of FE and EE1 (→EE2), which we give, the accentuated bass notes create a rhythmically simplified base motif of the Etude in bars 89-90: . category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC , Alterations in GC |
|||
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The bottom note of the penultimate chord in the R.H. was certainly corrected in GC, probably from d1 to e1. It is hard to state clearly whether it is Gutmann's own correction or whether it was Chopin that noticed and corrected the wrong pitch while reviewing GC. Cf. the note in bar 13. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GC , Alterations in GC |
|||
b. 118-120
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The version of FE1 (→FE2→EE1) is probably the original version, as it was initially written also in GC, in which it was corrected, probably by Chopin. Interestingly, in GC also the middle crotchets in the R.H. (from f1 to e1) were corrected, which in FE, however, are printed right away in the final version. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that seeing identical chords in the L.H., the copyist considered the crotchets in the R.H. also to be identical. It is even more likely considering the fact that in the manuscrpts only the first of the three bars was written out with notes. The version with g was written also in FESch. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic corrections of FE , Alterations in GC , Authentic corrections in GC , Annotations in FESch |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »