mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 554

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

Accent suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we add an accent over the syncopated chord after bar 199.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 554

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we omit the cautionary  before f​​​​​​​3, present in FE (→GE). The accidental was omitted also in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals

b. 554

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio signs in A (→FC→GE)

No signs in FE (→EE)
..

In FE (→EE), the lack of arpeggio signs in bar 554 is undoubtedly due to an error of the engraver of FE. Similarly in bar 559.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 555

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

a in EE, GC & FE

a in GE
..

In EE, GC and FE the fourth quaver is notated as a. The presence of 'a' notes as the ones comprising the chords in the previous and following bars indicates erroneous omissions of sharps by Chopin. And so the spot was corrected in GE accordingly.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Errors of GC

b. 555

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE

GC (→GE) and FE
..

In EE placement of  must have resulted from inaccurate interpretation of the basis/manuscript.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE inaccuracies