Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 437

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE, there is no  raising d2 to d​​​​​​​before the 1st semiquaver. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 437-438

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No marks in FE (→GE1GE2)

Wedges in EE

R.H. wedge in GE3

..

In this context, the missing staccato marks must be considered an inadvertence of Chopin or the engraver of FE, which was noticed already in EE and partially – only in the R.H. – also in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 438

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE before the chord there is natural on e2.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 438

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In A there is no  returning c4. The harmonic context and a comparison with an identical figure four bars earlier prove Chopin's mistake. The sign was added already in GE (→FEEE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A

b. 438-439

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slurs in FE (→GE1GE2)

Slurs in EE

No slurs in GE3

Slur suggested by the editors

..

According to us, both beginning the slur only just from the 2nd beat of the bar and the gap at the transition between the bars look like accidental inaccuracies that are probably related to the layout. In FE, and most probably also in [A], the b-c1 ​​​​​​​semiquavers opening the passage are written on the bottom stave, which hampers the placement of the beginning of the slur (it was considered an inaccuracy already in EE). In turn, the division of the slur could have resulted from, e.g. the transition into a new line. In the main text, we give a slur modelled after the unequivocal slur in analogous bars 434-435. The absence of slurs in GE3 must be regarded as a mistake – it was probably an oversight or an unfinished revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE