|
b. 433-438
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The shape of the accents in A, which are not very big, is generally typical of long accents (except for the sign in bar 437). However, in this case, it is understandable that the editions reproduced them as short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 433
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the semiquaver sequence is present in FE (→GE1→GE2) only in the L.H. In EE, an analogous slur was added for the R.H., which we consider a right revision. The change of markings in GE3 is arbitrary. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 434
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1,GE1→GE2), the 1st quaver is not encompassed with the octave sign. This patent mistake was rectified in EE2 (→EE3) and GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the slur is rather to be considered an inaccuracy – cf. analogous bars 410-411 and 438-439 (a slur, although inaccurate, is present also in bars 414-415). However, one has to point out that in the discussed place the span of the position encompassed with the slur would be the greatest. A comparison with analogous bars most probably also served as the basis for revision in GE and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Addition of staccato dots and shift of the beginning of the slur are arbitrary changes of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
