![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors resulting from corrections
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The sharp before the last semiquaver in FE is almost certainly a mistake – it is proved by comparison with analogous bar 196, 200 and 551, supported by deletion of the unnecessary accidental in FEJ. The awkward e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||||||
b. 607
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The vague and most probably erroneous notation of FE was probably supposed to look like the one applied two bars later – a d2 minim preceded by an a2 grace note. We adopt this obvious interpretation in the main text; it was applied already in EE. In turn, the version of GE may be the original version, completed by Chopin in the last proofreading of FE. We give a short grace note as an acceptable variant – see bar 609. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 667-670
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the middle notes of the tremolando that double the trill are devoid of extending dots. The inaccuracy was corrected in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||||||||
b. 670
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The 2nd minim in the notation of the tremolando in FE is only the a2-b2 second. The missing f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 715-716
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The continuous slur in FE (→EE) stems from the corrections in A, as a result of which the slur from b. 715, leading to the final, crossed-out fragment of the line, seems to suggest continuation. The situation misled also the copyist, who led that slur in FC to the next bar (which does not take place in A). Consequently, the slurs converged on the grace note, which the engraver of GE1 interpreted as one slur. This unanimity of the editors is startling if we take into account the fact that in the manuscripts the slur that starts in b. 715 is led under the notes, whereas the next one – over the notes, and nothing suggests that they should be merged. In the main text in b. 715 we give a literal interpretation of the slur of A, which does not reach the next bar, whereas in b. 716 – the slur of FC, compliant with the more accurate, according to us, slur of the manuscripts in b. 720. The issue of range of the slur over b. 716 – see b. 718-719. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Deletions in A |