Issues : Errors in FE
b. 541
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
No mark in FE or mark in b. 539 must be an error as in b. 544 the mark appears and performing all bars 538-544 sustained is unthinkable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||
b. 541-542
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be inadvertence. In EE, the slurring was completed in the simplest manner by adding a slur over the part of the phrase without it. In the main text, we suggest an adequate extension of the slur from the previous bar, in accordance with the slurs in all 5 analogous places. A similar revision was introduced in GE3; however, the slur was led only to the last semiquaver in bar 541. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||||
b. 542
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur of FE is a patent oversight. The slur was added both in GE and EE; however, in GE it combines the upper notes of the third, like in analogous bars, whereas in EE – the bottom ones (there was no space for a slur between the upper ones). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing marking of the top voice is obviously an inaccuracy of notation. In FE, the slur, placed high above that figure, suggests that stems and beam were planned here, but were overlooked by the engraver, perhaps due to the need to correct an erroneous note (one can see traces of removal of d3 at the beginning of the 3rd beat of the bar). The top voice was completed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||
b. 544
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing staccato dot in FE and GE1 must be a result of the engravers' oversights (the engraver of GE1 can be excused, since it is difficult to identify the mark in FC). The accent added in GE2 (→GE3) by analogy with the next bars is an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |