b. 311
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The placement of the dynamic marking in FE (→EE1) – before the 2nd triplet in the bar – suggests a mistake. The Chopinesque proofreading entry could have been misinterpreted; it could have been or even if the original was overlooked in the proof copy. In the first case, the composer's intention would be , which we include as an additional possibility. According to us, a possible change of the correctly printed to is highly unlikely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||
b. 311
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we omit the cautionary before g3. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||||
b. 311-312
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
A shorter slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) must be an inaccuracy, typical in this composition. In EE a similar slur was added in the L.H. In GE2 the slur was extended after A. Similarly in bars 315-316. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 311-312
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur in the first half of the bar is probably an oversight, either of the engraver of FE or Chopin, cf. analogous bar 295. However, the slur added in EE is almost certainly arbitrary, whereas the one in GE3 – modelled after the most probably inaccurate slur in the aforementioned bar 295. In the main text, we suggest adding a slur in the entire first half of the bar, just like in bar 295. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 311
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before c2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |