mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 8

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

..

In A (→FE), Chopin wrote only a  restoring e2 (in the R.H. part). The corresponding sign in the L.H. part was added in FC (→GE) and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Fontana's revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE

b. 8

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

..

We add a cautionary  to a1 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 8

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

..

In the main text, we add cautionary flats to B-b. The accidentals were also added in GE and EE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 8

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

..

In GE the last L.H. octave is erroneously a quaver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 8

composition: Op. 28 No. 20, Prelude in C minor

g tied in b. 8 in AB

No tying in remaining sources

g tied in b. 8 & 12, possible variant

g tied in b. 12, another possible variant
..

The version in AB with the tied g is undoubtedly authentic and recorded a year after the publication of the Prelude, which makes it necessary to treat it as a regular variant. It remains an open question, however, whether in the version extended by bars 9-12 it can also be used in bar 12 or even only in bar 12:

  • a clear strengthening of the dynamics in bars 11-12 of the published version can be considered as an argument against the sustaining of g in b. 12 – after all, in AB there is no crescendo at this passage, so the sustaining can be associated with the   dynamics;
  • in the 13-bar version, the pitch-rhythmic text of b. 9-12 does not differ from b. 5-8, which may justify the use of a uniform version of b. 8 and 12 – both times tying the g (or both times repeating it, as in main text);
  • perhaps Chopin did not associate the tie with either the dynamic progression or the preceding phrase, but treated it as an element of the work's conclusion, which would suggest tying only in bar 12.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources