



b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The inaccurate, later starting point of the slur in EE is most probably a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
|||||||
b. 8-11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
When interpreted literally, 3 consecutive slurs of A reach only the last quaver in the bar; moreover, the starting point of the slur in b. 9 is also not entirely clear (we assume that it is the 2nd quaver). Due to the reasons discussed in b. 1-2, we consider them to be inaccurate; in the main text we generally adopt the slurs of FE (→EE), compliant with the manner in which Chopin would correct in A some slurs in similar figures. In b. 9-10 the notation of the topmost L.H. notes on the top stave and writing them closer to the b category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||
b. 8-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 20, Prelude in C minor
..
The missing category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before the 3rd L.H. quaver (a category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
The crossing-out visible in A reveals that the 1st quaver in the 2nd half of the bar was initially d category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |