![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections in GC
b. 1-30
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC bars 1-69 are provided with numbers (numbers of bars). The numeration is a part of the abbreviated notation of bars 189-257 as a repetition of a respective fragment of the initial section. This manner of notation, characteristic for Chopin, was certainly used also in [A]. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
The version of FE is earlier – in GC one can see a correction, in which a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
FE (except for FE4) lacks in five necessary accidentals – naturals before d2 and b and sharps before f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
It is not clear whether Chopin wanted to have a grace note already in this bar – it appears without any doubts in bars 10, 22, 30 and analog. The ornament was deleted – most probably by Chopin – in GC, yet it remained in FE despite a few corrections and visible traces of development in pupil's copies. Due to these reasons, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |