|
b. 8-24
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In bar 8 the version of the R.H. adopted by us as the text of As (written in the main course of the text's line of As) is partially hypothetical, since the 1st quaver is blurred, whereas in the second the bottom note is unclear. One can consider the version of AI (excluding the rhythm) to be an alternative interpretation of this notation. The second of the given versions of As is written over the R.H. and under the L.H. of the first, probably with an intention to choose one of them later. In the version prepared for print, Chopin opted for an intermediate version in the R.H., in which d1 appears only in the 1st quaver, while in the L.H. he returned to the original version. The absence of In bar 24 all sources feature the same versions as in bar 8. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations |
|||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The f-b category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the part of the R.H. it is only GE2 that does not contain a rhythmic error. The version, however, resulted from a revision and it certainly does not correspond to Chopin's intention. For the remaining sources (except for EE3), we adopt an interpretation compatible with the way the R.H. is planned with respect to the quavers in the L.H. As the text of EE3 we adopt the rhythm that, according to us, predominates at the time of interpreting the easiest perceptible elements of the rhythm: a crotchet, an extended crotchet and a group of semiquavers with a triplet inside. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
|||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Numerous corrections on the 3rd beat of the bar (erasures and deletions) forced Chopin to write a group of three semiquavers on an adjacent stave. The group is embraced with a slur, which almost certainly means that it is a triplet. On the main stave, however, there is another slur in this place, starting from the previous semiquaver. The slur was most probably written earlier and concerned one of the deleted versions of this place. In this situation it is uncertain whether the new slur (over the triplet) was, according to Chopin, supposed to complement the previous (as a slur separating an irregular group) or whether Chopin inadvertently left a longer slur and the slur over the triplet was supposed to replace it. According to us, the latter is the most likely (cf. bar 13), hence we give this version in the main text. An alternative interpretation assumes a later addition of the longer slur as the final one. This is generally the way it was understood in GE (→FE→EE1→EE2), although due to a different interpretation of the rhythm, the slur embraces there the entire 3rd beat of the bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
An additional c1 note on the 5th quaver is certainly a mistake. The correct text in subsequent EE is a result of a comparison with analogous bars 27 and 76 or GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
1 ×3 in 
before d1 in the alternative version of 
-b-d
