



b. 172
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
A look at the dense GE1 notation allows us to say that the energico indication was placed in GE (→EE,IE) under the L.H. part only due to the lack of space between the staves. In FE the indication was omitted, probably due to inadvertence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 172-173
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The change of the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 173-174
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The version of EE is probably erroneous, both as regards the chord in bar 173 and the division into two hands in bar 174. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 173
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 173
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
As in bar 169, next to the bottom note of the 1st sixth in the 2nd half of the bar there is no accidental neither in A nor in GC and FE, which were proofread by Chopin. Therefore, we should accept this note to be d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |