|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The random slurring of AI is simply a reflection of the working nature of this autograph. In the main text we give more detailed indications of FE (→GE,EE). Cf. the note on the rhythmic notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The bottom voice is not marked in AI, which must be considered as a feature of a still immature notation and perhaps also a performance concept. It can be indicated by other dynamic indications – cf. notes in bars 7 and 8. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The indications of AI were changed in the version prepared for print, certainly with the participation of Chopin. Therefore, in the main text we give the version of FE (→EE). However, some of its elements can raise certain doubts, particularly the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In the proofreading of FE1 Chopin removed the tie sustaining d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
in 
in 
1 repeated in 
1 at the transition between bars 8 and 9.
in