mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 212

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Accent in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE
..

The missing accent in GE is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, although the mark could have also been added only just in the last proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 212-213

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FED (bars 212 & 216)

Fingering in FED, combination suggested by the editors

Fingering written into FEH (bars 212-213)

Fingering in FEH, combined from bars 212-213

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

The fingering of FED in bar 216 expands upon the indication from bar 212; hence, in the main text we give it together already for the first time. Similarly, the digit written in FEH in bar 213 complements the indications from bar 212. The fingerings in those copies differ in the first digit only; however, it may mark a different fingering of the entire sequence of semiquavers, since the digits in FED may be ascribed both to the left and right hand. In the former, the continuation would be the same as in FEH, while in the final part, perhaps the same as in EE. In the latter, the continuation (with the L.H.) could be completely different –  – although, obviously, it is not the only possibility. Generally, comparison of the fingering of those three sources is based mainly on assumptions, since the ranges of particular indications do not overlap, or they overlap to a negligible extent.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH

b. 212

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

in FE (→GE,EE)

suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 212-213

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

2  in GC

1  in FE (→EE)

No signs in GE1

2  in GE2
..

The absence of the  signs (diminuendo/long accent) in the 2nd half of bar 212 and at the beginning of bar 213 is certainly a mistake by the engraver of GE1. Similarly, we consider the omission of the second of these signs in FE (→EE) to be an error. GE2 added both signs, however, the one in the 2nd half of bar 212, which in GC is placed slightly earlier than the neighbouring ones, was erroneously assigned to the 3rd chord.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 213

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

No marking in GC (→GE) & FE1 (→FE2→EE1)

in FE3 (→FE4) & EE2
..

Chopin added the  indication in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE2). It was repeated also in EE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE