|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In A, the extent of the slur is not quite clear. The interpretation adopted in GE (→FE→EE) is possible, yet in our opinion a longer slur, reaching the crotchet on the 2nd beat of the bar, is much more likely. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In A, the difference in notation of the two R.H. accents in this bar is very pronounced. Nevertheless, the second one - the long one - was in GE (→FE→EE) reproduced as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We give the precise notation of A, which later underwent gradual distortions in GE1 and FE (→EE): first the omission of the dot and moving of the accent, then lowering of the curved line. As a result, in FE (→EE) the note a is sustained, which almost certainly goes against Chopin's intentions, as changes did not have the nature of corrections at any stage category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The accidental before the last crotchet of the L.H. is placed inaccurately in A, so it is not clear to which of the lower notes of the chord it was supposed to refer. Most arguments point to the reading of those notes as g-b flat. This is the version given by all the first editions. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidental below/above the note |
||||||||
|
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In A it is not quite clear where this slur ends, but in AI it definitely reaches f1 in bar 9, just like in A in analogous bars 28-29. Therefore in our main text we extend the slur to f1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
