mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 140-159

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

..

In A almost the entire reprise (bars 105-171) is written in an abbreviated manner, in the form of empty, numerated bars, corresponding to bars 1-67.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Abbreviated notation of A

b. 140

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

No sign in A

Tie to F in FE (→GE1)

Slur e-f in EE & GE2 (→GE3→GE4)
..

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions

b. 140

composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

A fingering digit is the most likely interpretation of the diagonal line performed in pencil visible in FED.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 140

composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major

 in A

No sign in FE (→GE,EE)
..

The missing  hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 140-141

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Slur from 2nd quaver in A (→FE)

Slur from 1st quaver in GE & EE
..

The beginning of the slur in FE is written slightly inaccurately, which explains an earlier beginning of the slur in all the remaining editions (one quaver too early). The interpretation of the slur of A – see bars 12-13.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE