|
b. 109-113
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Chopin added a several-bar long crescendo both in FC (→GE) and in the proofreading of FE (→EE) (the latter started a bar later). In the main text we give the indication of FC, since it forms part of a much more detailed set of dynamic indications for the entire theme. The dashes marking the range of the crescendo are led in both groups of sources (except for GE1) to the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The accent in AF is quite short in this bar, hence it is its shape and context that make us consider it a long accent. The presence of a significantly longer mark in FE (→EE) – such as in analogous b. 17 – points to a possible intervention of a reviser or perhaps Chopin himself. A change performed on Chopin's order would confirm the mark to be a long accent. The mark in GE1 was placed inaccurately, so it is not entirely certain which beat of the bar it concerns. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the wedge written in AF. The mark is very long and distinct, hence it is difficult to overlook it. Its absence in FE (→EE) may result from a misunderstanding – the engraver could have interpreted it as a crossed-out dot. See also b. 115. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Wedges |
|||||||||||
|
b. 109-110
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Th lack of slur in FE (→EE) is undoubtedly the engraver's mistake. A similar mistake happened to Chopin in AF in b. 112. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Pointing slurs |
|||||||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the arpeggio present in FE2 and EE (in the copy of FE1 the page including this bar is missing). Its authenticity is highly likely – the mark is present before a chord of a similar span in an analogous place in b. 33. Cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 5a. category imprint: Differences between sources |
mark, which, however, falls on a different bar in each of the groups: see the note to b. 
in 
