![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
b. 173-189
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in four previous analogous places, in bar 173 Chopin added an a1 note in the last proofreading of FE (→EE). We consider the absence of a respective addition in bar 189 to be an oversight (of the composer or the engraver), although a possibility of intentionally leaving the last repetition of this phrase in a slightly different form cannot be, obviously, excluded. It was considered to be a mistake already by the reviser of EEW1 (→EEW2). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
b. 182
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In analogous bar 10 Chopin changed the B category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
b. 185
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 186-187
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text, we give the slurs of the sources; however, taking into account the fact that the slurs in analogous b. 182-184 were possibly proofread, we suggest prolonging the slurs respectively here as well. Chopin could have assumed that the slurs given the first time would be enough to indicate the correct performance; on the other hand, one cannot exclude carelessness of the engraver, who could have implemented only the half of the marked corrections. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 194-195
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The analysis of the corrections of slurs in similar motifs that are visible in A – in b. 8-19, 100-101 and perhaps 198-199, one can see that the slurs were being prolonged so that they reached the minim ending the motif – leads to the conclusion that the slur in the discussed bars is the initial version of slurring of this figure, left by inadvertence. Therefore, in the main text we give a longer slur, compliant with the final slurring concept. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |