Issues : Authentic post-publication changes and variants
b. 315-316
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the slurs added in FED, running from the 2nd semiquaver to the octave on the 2nd beat of the bar. According to us, it specifies the notation and harmonises with the printed notation – cf. the slurs in the L.H. in these bars and the slur in the R.H. in bar 317. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Authentic post-publication changes and variants |
|||||
b. 401
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The mark in the form of a diagonal cross written in FEH before the 1st grace note of the bar is probably a raising f1 to f1. At the same time, it cannot be excluded that, according to the intention of the writing person, it should apply both to this grace note and the first out of four small notes ending the trill. However, we have to point out that this mark may be simply one of the crosses with which Chopin would often mark the places discussed during a lesson. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEH |
|||||
b. 522
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The natural lowering g2 to g2, written in ink in FESf, defines a version that, according to us, may be considered a potentially authentic variant:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
b. 583
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the extended version of semiquaver figures given in the edition of the Concerto edited by Mikuli (see bar 153) as a 'Chopinesque variant.' However, it is uncertain whether the egualmente indication and the fingering are also authentic – the fact that, e.g. not all fingerings come from Chopin is openly discussed by Mikuli in the preface to his edition: '[...] the fingering of the edition comes largely from Chopin; wherever this is not the case, it is at least written according to his rules [...].'* * "[...] der Fingersatz dieser Ausgabe grossentheils von Chopin selbst herrührt, wo dies aber nicht der Fall, wenigstens seinen Grundsätzen entsprechend notirt ist [...]" category imprint: Differences between sources |