mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in EE

b. 333

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

EE1 (→EE2) is missing the cautionary  before f​​​​​​​1. The accidental, present in FE (→GE), was added also in EE3. In an analogous situation 2 bars later, a respective  is present in all sources.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Cautionary accidentals

b. 335

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Accent in FE (→GE)

No mark in EE
..

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in EE

b. 336-337

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur in FE (→GE) & EE2 (→EE3)
..

In EE1, there is no slur in the L.H. It was added already by the reviser of EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 341

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

e3 in FE (→GE1,EE1)

d3 in GE2 i EE2 (→EE3)
..

e​​​​​​​3 as the 5th semiquaver in FE (→GE1,EE1) is almost certainly a mistake – disturbing a regular progression is both harmonically and melodically unjustified. The engraver's mistake could have been provoked by resemblance of the 2nd half of that bar to the 1st half of the next one – such a hypothesis is confirmed by visible traces of removal of the  from before a3, the 7th semiquaver in bar 341, in FE. The revisers of GE2 and EE2 (→EE3) corrected that note.  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 344-347

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Slur in EE

Slur in GC, literal reading

Slur in GC (interpretation) and GE

Slur in FE
..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Inaccuracies in GC , Errors of GC