Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
|
b. 77-79
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text, we give the accent in bar 79 on the basis of FC, where it could have been written by Chopin (cf. bars 71-75). The sign in bar 77 is probably the original version of the accent, left by inattention, analogous to the signs present in the passages including one bar only, hence we suggest there a long accent based on analogous bars. This is the notation, probably original, that is included in FE in bar 77 and in EE and GE in both discussed bars. The notation of FE in bar 79, used in this context only there, may be erroneous (see also bars 74-76). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 77-78
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In FE (→EE) a routine transfer of the slur to the side of noteheads changed the unequivocal slur of A1 into a tie of c1. Unlike in b. 65-66, no attempts were taken to correct that mistake. In the main text we give the unequivocal version of A1 and GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 78-80
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text, we give the accents in bar 78 after the notation of FC, corrected by Chopin. We also apply it in bar 80, overlooked at the time of corrections, probably as a result of the composer's inattention. The versions of the editions are probably inaccurate or inconclusive (cf. bars 74-76). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In the main text we suggest adding a cresc. marking after b. 62, with which the discussed bar is supposed to be identical. Since Chopin added cresc. in b. 62, its absence here is most probably an overlooked correction of one of a few analogous places, a frequent phenomenon in Chopin's works. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 79-82
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Omission of the pedalling signs in FE in bar 80 is certainly an oversight (cf. bars 31-32), therefore, in the main text we suggest to complete them after all previous analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
